State Experiences Show Why Repealing the ACA’s Premium Subsidies and Individual Mandate Would Cripple Individual Health Insurance Markets

By Justin Giovannelli and Kevin Lucia

Congressional Republicans and the new president are pushing to repeal key portions of the Affordable Care Act, including the law’s financial subsidies for low- and middle-income Americans and the individual mandate. Opponents of the law promise repeal will be followed by a replacement plan, but the timing, content, and political viability of an ACA alternative remain highly uncertain.

What happens if portions of the ACA are repealed without timely replacement? Independent quantitative analyses find millions of Americans would lose coverage. The resulting regulatory landscape would look like what several states had in place prior to the ACA. Their experiences were similarly grim.

In a new study for The Commonwealth Fund, Justin Giovannelli and Kevin Lucia examine state health reform efforts prior to the ACA to see what they can tell us about the effects of repeal. You can read their analysis here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The opinions expressed here are solely those of the individual blog post authors and do not represent the views of Georgetown University, the Center on Health Insurance Reforms, any organization that the author is affiliated with, or the opinions of any other author who publishes on this blog.