New York’s Law to Protect People from Surprise Balance Bills is Working as Intended, but Gaps Remain

By Sabrina Corlette and Olivia Hoppe

In 2014 New York enacted a first-in-the-nation law designed to protect people from surprise balance bills. The law has been held out as a model for other states as well as potential federal legislation. Its unique approach – banning balance billing in circumstances when consumers could not reasonably be expected to choose between an in- and out-of-network doctor and using “baseball style” arbitration to settle billing disputes between insurers and physicians – generated surprising buy-in among a set of stakeholders that typically have strongly opposing views.

In a new report supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Altarum, insurance experts at Georgetown University’s Center on Health Insurance Reforms (CHIR) share findings from a case assessing New York’s experience with its Surprise Billing law, 5 years in. Key findings include:

  • A front-loaded legislative process that required key stakeholders (payers, providers, and consumer advocates) to make critical compromises early helped ease implementation.
  • Reports about surprise out-of-network bills went from being a top consumer complaint in New York to “barely an issue.”
  • Both provider and insurer stakeholders view the dispute resolution process as fair, with arbitration decisions roughly evenly split between the two sides.
  • Concerns that the law would have inflationary effects on physician pricing have not yet borne out, but it may take time for the incentives created under the law to change the behavior of market actors.
  • There remain significant gaps in consumer protection, including:
    • Self-funded employer plans are not subject to the law’s protections;
    • The law does not fully protect consumers when the surprise out-of-network bill arises because they have been misinformed – either by their plan directory or their provider’s office staff – about the provider’s network status;
    • Out-of-network hospitals are not subject to the law. Even though health plans are required to pay for emergency services at these facilities, consumers still receive – and many inadvertently pay – surprise bills after an ER visit at an out-of-network hospital.

Download the full report here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The opinions expressed here are solely those of the individual blog post authors and do not represent the views of Georgetown University, the Center on Health Insurance Reforms, any organization that the author is affiliated with, or the opinions of any other author who publishes on this blog.