Category: Implementing the Affordable Care Act

Comparing Short-term Health Plans is Practically Impossible for Consumers

The Trump administration has promoted short-term health plans as a cheap substitute for comprehensive, Affordable Care Act-compliant health insurance. In this guest post for CHIRblog, former Montana insurance regulator Christina L. Goe reviewed a wide range short-term plan policies and found multiple confusing and complicated plan terms that make it difficult for consumers to assess and compare plans and could expose them to considerable financial risk.

Limitations of Short-Term Health Plans Persist Despite Predictions That They’d Evolve

The Congressional Budget Office and others predicted that short-term health plans would become more generous in the wake of the Trump administration’s policy to encourage their use as an alternative to Affordable Care Act coverage. In their latest post for the Commonwealth Fund’s To the Point blog, CHIR experts reviewed over 400 short-term plan policies to determine if, in fact, they have become more comprehensive over time.

One Victim of the COVID-19 Pandemic? State Health Policy

State legislative sessions are typically a flurry of health policy activity. In recent years, state lawmakers have taken action to stabilize their insurance markets and increase access to coverage. But like so many other constants we have come to rely on, state legislative sessions took a hit this year from the novel coronavirus pandemic, putting current and future state policy initiatives in jeopardy.

June Research Round Up: What We’re Reading

This month, CHIR’s Olivia Hoppe read studies on the novel coronavirus’ potential impact on insurance coverage, individual market enrollment trends during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the role provider directories play in surprise billing.

Effects of Medicaid Health Plan Dominance on the Health Insurance Marketplaces

Medicaid insurers dominate many of the Affordable Care Act health insurance marketplaces. Some health system stakeholders have raised concerns about the potential negative consequences of Medicaid insurer participation in the market, largely due to their limited networks. In a new report supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, CHIR and Urban Institute experts assess how Medicaid insurers function in the marketplace.

On the Whole, Health Insurers Aren’t – Yet – Fearing COVID-19 Costs: A Review of 2021 Rate Filings

Several states ask for – and publicly post – health insurers’ proposed 2021 premium rates in May and June. These early rate filings can provide hints about how insurers are responding to market trends, policy changes, and emerging drivers of health care costs. CHIR’s Sabrina Corlette took a deep dive into insurers’ actuarial memos to find out how they’re thinking about COVID-19, repeal of the ACA’s individual mandate penalty, and more.

May Research Round Up: What We’re Reading

This May, we explored studies assessing COVID-19’s effect on community health centers, data on racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 mortality rates, and changes in health spending and utilization during the crisis.

Navigators Can Help Close Insurance Gaps Exacerbated by COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced new challenges for Navigators. To learn more about their experience, and how they are helping consumers manage often unexpected transitions in coverage, CHIR’s Olivia Hoppe talked with six navigators across five states using the FFM to hear how they were faring.

A Pledge to Do Better

We at CHIR are reeling and taking stock in the wake of the tragic and callous murder of George Floyd, as well as the unsurprising unrest caused by our nation’s longstanding indifference to the pain of communities of color. At CHIR, we spend our professional lives focused on improving people’s access to affordable, high quality health insurance. The work is an honor and we believe we are helping to advance policies that allow more people to get better health care without facing financial ruin.

However, we know we have privileges we too often take for granted and that, at times, have blinded us to well-documented inequities in our health care system. The fact is that we have not thought deeply enough about the longstanding and structural racism that makes it more likely that Black, Hispanic, and Native American/Alaskan Native people are uninsured, more likely to suffer from high out-of-pocket costs, more likely to lack access to providers, and more likely to get poor quality care. We can and must do more. As researchers and policy analysts, we can study the data to better understand the challenges facing communities of color. We can proactively seek out voices in those communities who are documenting and sharing their lived experiences. We can consciously and carefully assess the disparate impacts of policy choices, and work a lot harder to lift up those policies that lift up people of color. We don’t pretend that our efforts to learn about these issues and integrate them into our work in a deeper and more conscious way will make a big difference, but they could make a small difference. What we realize is that these efforts are essential to our mission and values.

We would love to hear from you. If you know of ways in which we can better integrate these important issues into our work and share them with decision makers, please let us know.

I’ve been calling for greater private insurance coverage of COVID-19 testing. I’ve been wrong

As the nation combats the biggest threat to its public health and economy that any of us have seen in our lifetimes, the key to recovery will lie in widespread, universally accessible testing for COVID-19. In a recent blog post for Health Affairs, CHIR’s Sabrina Corlette argues that our traditional, insurance-based model of financing health care services won’t work if we want to use testing to help us get back to work, schools, and community life.

The opinions expressed here are solely those of the individual blog post authors and do not represent the views of Georgetown University, the Center on Health Insurance Reforms, any organization that the author is affiliated with, or the opinions of any other author who publishes on this blog.