It’s getting to be a summer tradition: a new set of court decisions on the Affordable Care Act. This past week two courts reached opposite conclusions on whether the IRS can issue subsidies through the federally facilitated marketplaces, affecting potentially 7.3 million people. Research Fellow Sandy Ahn talks about these decisions and their impact on the ACA’s ability to address the “three As” of health coverage: access, affordability, and adequacy.
Last week the state of Washington finalized rules banning insurers from imposing benefit-specific waiting periods on policyholders. Sandy Ahn, a new Research Fellow at CHIR, reviews the rule and how it’s likely to affect consumers.
The ACA includes numerous consumer protections designed to remedy shortcomings in the availability, affordability, adequacy, and transparency of individual market insurance. However, because states continue to be the primary regulators of health insurance and implementers of these requirements, consumers are likely to experience some of these new protections differently, depending on where they live. CHIR’s latest issue brief finds that consumers nationwide will enjoy improved protections in each area targeted by the reforms.
Washington DC’s NBC affiliate wanted a status report on the Affordable Care Act, 6 months after full implementation. They turned to one of CHIR’s ACA experts, Sabrina Corlette, for a look at the law’s successes to date, as well as challenges ahead.
The Commonwealth Fund recently hosted a one-hour webinar on the small business health insurance marketplaces created under the Affordable Care Act. The webinar, led by CHIR’s Kevin Lucia and Sarah Dash and joined by state and federal officials, examined key state marketplace design decisions, small business perspectives, and the future of the program. Ashley Williams provides this overview.
While narrow provider networks are by no means new to health insurance, the practice has received renewed attention as plans participating in the marketplaces turn to network design to keep premium costs low. While consumers benefit from more affordable insurance, overly narrow networks can risk the quality of care consumers receive and increase their out-of-pocket costs. In this blog post originally published by Health Affairs, CHIR’s Sabrina Corlette and JoAnn Volk and the Urban Institute’s Robert Berenson and Judy Feder discuss the cost-access trade-offs for consumers and offer a few recommendations for policymakers.
In March, the Obama administration extended for two additional years a policy allowing states to permit insurers to renew health plans that are not compliant with the Affordable Care Act. In their latest blog post for the Commonwealth Fund, CHIR researchers Kevin Lucia, Sabrina Corlette, and Ashley Williams document states’ decisions on whether or not to allow the extension of non-compliant plans and the implications for 2015 premiums, SHOP enrollment, and consumer protection.
A recent complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Civil Rights against four Florida insurers targets them for violating the Affordable Care Act’s prohibition against discrimination. CHIR expert Sally McCarty evaluates the complaint and its implications for consumers and state insurance regulators.
A new survey commissioned by Enroll America helps us understand why some of the uninsured enrolled in new coverage options under the Affordable Care Act, but others did not. And it includes recommendations to prepare for the next round of open enrollment. Our colleague at Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families, Cathy Hope, provides this overview.
In response to actions by some health plans to impose benefit-specific waiting periods for coverage of serious health conditions, such as organ transplants, the Obama Administration recently issued guidance to prohibit the practice and protect consumers from discriminatory benefit design. Georgetown Law Center’s Sandy Ahn reviews the new guidance and the impact for consumers in this guest post.
The opinions expressed here are solely those of the individual blog post authors and do not represent the views of Georgetown University, the Center on Health Insurance Reforms, any organization that the author is affiliated with, or the opinions of any other author who publishes on this blog.
