{"id":4933,"date":"2019-01-31T09:51:20","date_gmt":"2019-01-31T14:51:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chirblog.org\/?p=4933"},"modified":"2019-01-31T09:51:20","modified_gmt":"2019-01-31T14:51:20","slug":"short-term-insurance-marketing-consumer-confusion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirblog.org\/short-term-insurance-marketing-consumer-confusion\/","title":{"rendered":"The Marketing of Short-Term Health Plans: Industry Practices Create Consumer Confusion"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Sabrina Corlette, Kevin Lucia, Dania Palanker, and Olivia Hoppe<\/em><\/p>\n

A 2018 federal rule changing the definition of short-term limited-duration insurance (STLDI) has created a new marketing opportunity for insurance companies and brokers. STLDI can now be sold as full-year substitute coverage for traditional health insurance even though it is exempt from the consumer protections prescribed by the Affordable Care Act (ACA).<\/p>\n

STLDI tends to have lower premiums than ACA coverage, but depending on how it is marketed and sold, can be risky for consumers. Many buy these plans mistakenly believing that they are as comprehensive as traditional, ACA-compliant plans. A growing market for STLDI plans also places new demands on state insurance departments, which are responsible for overseeing insurers and consumer protection. In a recently released study<\/a>, we assess short-term limited-duration insurers\u2019 marketing tactics in the wake of the new federal rules and, through interviews with insurance officials in Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Maine, Minnesota, Missouri, Texas, and Virginia, how regulators have evaluated and prepared for this new market. Key findings include the following:<\/p>\n